Monday Morning Musings: 2009 Oakland Raiders Draft Class
NEW YORK — SBReport takes a look back at the Oakland Raiders’ draft class and the outlooks for each player in Silver & Black:
Round 1, Pick 7 (7) – Darrius Heyward-Bey, WR Maryland
The Oakland Raiders coveted Heyward-Bey’s attributes and big play potential. At the time of their selection, not one wide receiver had come off the board. This lead to the overwhelming critique of the pick especially considering that Michael Crabtree and Jeremy Maclin were recognized as superior talents than the speedster out of Maryland. Oakland got their guy and only time will tell whether or not he will be the downfield menace that will help JaMarcus Russell stretch the field. But what can be questioned is the value they got with this pick and how they probably could’ve traded down and paid Heyward-Bey less while picking up an extra pick or two.
The draft is a crap-shoot, and it’s hard to find out other team’s intentions. So you can see the Raiders approach in taking Heyward-Bey at no. seven. The possibility of trading down and then having another club take the player you covet is a risk. But with Crabtree going to San Francisco at 10, and Maclin going 19 to Philadelphia, it would have been profitable and realistic for the Silver & Black to move down below their seventh slot and still take their target. With the economy influencing personnel decisions since the start of the off-season, it would have been economical for the Raiders to make this move. The only question remains is whether or not any teams would have been interested in moving up?
PROS: Speed and big play potential. Gives the Raiders a receiver that can chase down bombs from Russell.
CONS: Very raw, not a precise route runner and still needs a lot of polishing to become a number one go to target in the NFL. And when you take a receiver with the seventh overall pick, he better become a top flight pass catcher.
Round 2, Pick 15 (47) – Mike Mitchell, SS Ohio
Another player Oakland had high on their draft board. Many suggested that he was a second day pick at best, or an un-drafted free agent candidate at the time of the selection. Rumors circulated that the Bears were locked in on Mitchell with the 49th pick, so Oakland nabbed a talent they have high hopes for. Mitchell has speed, can clobber ball carriers and is expected to compete immediately for the starting SS spot. He said prior to the draft, “It’s so weird that I’ve been flying under the radar, and at times it’s been frustrating,” he said. “I’ve been playing well, I’ve never been in trouble, I truly believe I’m a good person with a good heart.
“If you ask people about Mike Mitchell, they’ll tell you he’s a hard worker and a great leader. He’s a guy who’s going to give 110 percent every time he steps on the field whether it be a workout or anything regarding football, he’s always putting his best foot forward. And I’m definitely proud of that.”
Michael Huff has been a bust so far, but if he can re-energize his career at FS under a new coordinator, the only players standing between Mitchell and a place in the starting line-up will be Hiram Eugene and Tyvon Branch.
PROS: Good character, adds more quickness and toughness to the defensive backfield.
CONS: From a small school, did not face elite competition, and when you step up to the NFL, the game gets faster and more complex. Can he handle that, or is he just a physical specimen?
Round 3, Pick 7 (71) – Matt Shaugnessy, DE Wisconsin
Tom Cable adds a tough competitor in Shaugnessy, as Oakland continued to fill voids on their roster with position specific selections. He will be a project at end and is similar to Jay Richardson in that he won’t bring a lot of heat off the edge, but can fight along the trenches and wrap up ball carriers around the line of scrimmage. He lacks explosion and because of his size, Shaugnessy will get pushed around early in his career. Oakland took a shot at Trevor Scott last season and found a high motor end that tallied 5 sacks. But that was in the 6th round, and when you take a player in the 3rd round, teams expect them to contribute or not be so much of a project as Shaugnessy is.
Shaughnessy reportedly talked to Raiders’ defensive line coach Dwaine Board, who told him the Silver & Black expects him to work hard and compete for a spot in the rotation.
PROS: Will work hard, add toughness and with the right coaching, can become a reliable edge defender.
CONS: Oakland still does not have a starting caliber end opposite Derrick Burgess. The are questions whether or not Scott can handle being an every down defensive end, Richardson is pedestrian and Shaugnessy needs to be groomed for a year or two before you see what he can do at the pro level.
Round 4, Pick 24 (124) – Louis Murphy, WR Florida (From New England)
It was good to see Oakland address their weak wide receiver unit in this draft. Murphy is another big target for Russell and a player that could challenge for reps due to his abilities when the ball is in his hands and large frame. The Raiders need a receiver that can work the middle of the field, run precise shorter routes and give Russell and intermediate target from 5-10 yards off the line of scrimmage. That is not Heyward-Bey’s forte, and others on the roster like Chaz Schilens and Johnnie Lee Higgins have not shown they can be that type of player with any regularity.
PROS: Injects more pop to the Raider offense, adds talent to a weak crop at WR and is from a winning program.
CONS: Florida receivers have not fared well at the pro level, not very physical, which can be a big problem on Sundays when getting off the line and facing press coverage and needs to get more sure-handed.
Round 4, Pick 26 (126) – Slade Norris, DE/OLB Oregon State (From Miami)
Oakland emphasized adding speed to their roster with this pick in the 4th round. Norris could compete for the lone available OLB spot that Oakland has tried to fill in recent years with Robert Thomas, Sam Williams and Ricky Brown.
They may be able to live with Norris on the same unit as Thomas Howard and Kirk Morrison due to his quickness, willingness to learn and solid character. “He’s been here long enough, and I think guys look up to him,” Oregon State defensive line coach Joe Seumalo told the Gazette-Times newspaper. “He’s contributed enough that guys can look to him as a leader and a mentor. The young guys lean heavy on him.”
PROS: At best could round out the linebacker corps, at worst, could add speed to an already solid special teams coverage unit.
CONS: Another project/hybrid player. Oakland rarely develops nor can max out the potential of players that have been ‘tweeners.’
Round 6, Pick 26 (199) – Stryker Sulak, DE Missouri (From New England)
Sulak got better every year in college. He has good quickness, a solid initial burst and is solid in pursuit. But he lacks bulk and is another ‘tweener’ that may not have a position in the league.
This pick may not make the roster unless he can handle playing at strong side linebacker.
PROS: Has a good motor, the desire to get better and is a good team guy.
CONS: At best he projects as a back-up at this point, and with Isaiah Ekejiuba, Sam Williams and other special team’s specialist, the Raiders cannot afford to keep players on their roster who cannot contribute to many facets of the club.
Round 6, Pick 29 (202) – Brandon Myers, TE Iowa (From Carolina)
Oakland has needed a tight end who can be a solid edge blocker for some time. Zach Miller is arguably the team’s most reliable target, and Russell’s security blanket, but he is also the team’s most reliable wall in pass protection. The Raiders hope Myers can make the team and model his game to Roland Williams, a tight end who provided a lot of edge support in the run and pass game some time ago. This will free up Miller and give the Raiders a hefty two tight end set in goal line and short yardage situations.
PROS: Will help the run game and free up Miller.
CONS: Not a pass catcher and will need to work on technique to make a living as a full time blocker at the pro level.
Contact Author: Victor Cotto – SB Report Columnist
